A travesty occurred in San Diego today, Jovan Jackson a US Navy Veteran and medical marijuana patient was denied a medical marijuana defense in State Court.
After the decision came this morning, Steve Walters, Dumanis' #1, celebrated the Judge's decision with high fives and congratulatory hugs to Linbergh and the other DA's gathered in the courtroom to witness the Judge's decision.
According to Judge Shore, all 1600 members of the Answerdam collective would have had to participate in the cultivation of marijuana. The Judge maintains that sales of marijuana are not legal and that dispensaries are not legal. The only thing legal according to the DA and Judge Shore, is a community garden, where all members associate only for the purposes of cultivation.
Lance Rogers, Jovan Jackson's attorney said after the hearing that today's decision will be appealed.
Jovan Jackson is due back in court on September 8th at 9am.
More information coming soon..
Tuesday, August 31, 2010
Judge Shore Denies Medical Marijuana Defense in State Court for Jovan Jackson Second MMJ Trial
Monday, August 30, 2010
Judge Shore to decide Tuesday if Jovan Jackson gets medical marijuana defense in state court
Dumanis Continues Attempts to prevent medical defense in Second Trial
By: Eugene Davidovich
SAN DIEGO – Despite being acquitted by a jury late last year of charges stemming from a 2008 arrest on marijuana possession and distribution charges, medical marijuana patient and provider Jovan Jackson is being tried by San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis for a second time in less than a year in connection with Operation Green Rx, an undercover sting operation targeting all medical marijuana collectives in San Diego and resulting in multiple raids and dozens of arrests.
In the weeks leading up to the second trial, Chris Linbergh the prosecutor in Jackson’s case, filed a motion with the court under Evidence Code § 402 to preclude the medical marijuana defense. According to Lindbergh, telling the jury that Mr. Jackson’s was a medical marijuana patient and that he participated in a legal collective, including cultivating cannabis for the collective, would be a potentially confusing matter and should be kept secret.
The prosecution maintains that all sales of medical marijuana are illegal and that only a group farm is allowed under state law, where all patients participate in the cultivation of marijuana, and associate only for the purposes of cultivation, rather than for the purposes of facilitating transactions between members, as the California Attorney General’s Guidelines define a collective to be.
Two weeks ago, Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country's leading medical marijuana patient advocacy group filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in support of Jackson's defense, refuting the District Attorney's allegations that sales are illegal. The court refused to accept the brief and forced the defense to present additional evidence of cultivation.
Today, Jackson was back in court for the evidentiary hearing and the proceedings began with Detective Mark Andrew Carlson taking the stand. Detective Carlson was one of the undercover operatives and chief investigator in Jackson’s case. Although very hesitantly, the Detective through the excellent questions presented by Lance Rogers, did end up testifying that he saw both cultivation equipment in the collective and evidence of cultivation in the paperwork seized.
Shockingly, this was not enough for Judge Shore to allow a defense in. The Judge forced the defense team to call more witnesses. Lance Rogers, Jackson’s attorney called the next witness who was a member of the collective. Following the member’s testimony which was brief, Jovan Jackson himself took the stand.
Jackson testified today that he was in fact a member of Answerdam and helped rent a space in a commercial building for the purposes of cultivating medical marijuana. Together with other members of the collective, he cultivated cannabis, harvested the medicine, and brought it to the Answerdam collective for distribution to other members.
Lindbergh kept Jackson on the stand for over three hours questioning him about every detail of the cultivation. At one point, Lindbergh’s face turned red, he raised his voice and began shouting at Jovan in what appeared to be frustration. The Judge had to stop Linbergh several times throughout the proceedings and instruct him on proper court etiquette including how to properly form a question for a witness. This questioning and badgering of Jovan Jackson on the witness stand went on as Dumanis’ #1, Steve Walters, along with five other prosecutors sat in the courtroom, intimidating Jackson and helping the prosecution.
In a previous statement regarding this case, Joe Elford, ASA Chief Counsel said "To deny a medical marijuana provider the ability to defend himself in court based on an argument that what he did was illegal, not only ignores relevant medical marijuana law, but also smacks of circular logic, Dumanis appears against the wall in trying to prove her ill-reasoned legal theory and is attempting anything that will give her the advantage at trial."
Although the Judge initially seemed determined to keep the medical marijuana defense out, it appeared that after having heard all the testimony, and realizing that he would be making a serious mistake and committing a grave injustice, Judge Shore decided to hold off on making a decision until the following day.
Jovan Jackson is due back in court on Tuesday at 9:00am to hear Lindbergh’s final attempts at keeping him from having a fair trial and to hear the Judges final decision.
This will be a pivotal moment in the case and your support in the courtroom is needed. Please come out and help us show the Judge that the community supports Mr. Jackson, and expects a fair trial in state court.
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Support SJR 14 to Help Change Federal Law!
Please take a moment to contact your representative in the California Assembly and ask him or her to vote yes on SJR 14. You can find out who your representative is by visiting http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/yourleg.html or calling (916) 319-2856. Please do this today. The vote could come at any time!
SJR 14 calls for (1) an end federal raids, intimidation, and interference with state medical cannabis laws, (2) policies and laws to encourage advanced clinical research trials into the therapeutic use of cannabis, (3) an affirmative defense to medical cannabis charges in federal court, and (4) a comprehensive federal medical cannabis policy that ensures safe and legal access for patients.
When approved by the California Assembly, SJR 14 will become an important part of ASA’s national campaign to protect patients’ rights and change federal medical cannabis law. This is important right now. Federal raids have slowed under the Obama Administration, but they have not stopped all together. Federal interference and intimidation are still very real, and outdated federal policies block scientific research into medical cannabis.
On August 24, 2009, the California Senate passed SJR 14 by a vote of 23-15.
We have only a short time to get this resolution adopted this year. Please visit our online action center today to urge your California state senator to support support Senator Leno’s SJR 14.
SJR 14 Resources:
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Court Support RIVERSIDE – Ronald Naulls
WHAT: Ronald Bradley Naulls - Healing Nations Collective of Corona
WHEN: 8/30/2010 – 8:30am
WHERE: U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California - Judge Phillips - 3470 Twelfth St - Riverside, CA 92501
THE NAULLS FAMILY LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Federal War on Medical Marijuana Becomes a War on Children: Three Little Girls, ages 1, 3, and 5, seized in DEA raid.
A church-going family man who used medical marijuana to ease chronic pain from injuries sustained in a 2001 car accident, Ronald Naulls already had two successful careers - one as an IT consultant and another in real estate - when (in early 2006) he established the Healing Nations Collective in Corona (Riverside County) to save fellow patients the hours-long drive to Los Angeles for medicine.
Healing Nations was a model collective in every way. It served its patient-members well and followed state and local law. It maintained strict dress codes and professional standards for all employees. It paid state taxes - amounting to several hundred thousand dollars a year - even when loose tax regulations allowed other dispensaries to slip through the cracks. Proceeds from the dispensary went to local and national cancer organizations.
Nevertheless, at 5:50 a.m., July 17, 2007, after a year of successful zoning litigation with the city, Naulls's home and the collective were invaded by DEA agents armed with shotguns, automatic rifles - even helicopters. They seized everything: His property. All of his personal accounts. And all of the collective's assets. Naulls was arrested and is now facing federal prosecution for distribution of medical cannabis.
But that wasn't the worst of it. County child protective services came along on the raid and took Naulls's three little girls, ages 1, 3, and 5, and charged him and his wife with child endangerment. They weren't even accused of breaking any state laws.
When Naulls spoke to his children in their confidential foster home, the big sister said, "Daddy, we're ready to come home now, we promise to be good."
Of course, they were too young to understand that they were victims of the strong-arm tactics of drug warriors whose goal was to make Naulls regret helping fellow patients receive their medicine in a safe, compassionate environment. Who cares if that means ruining a family financially, imprisoning the parents, and traumatizing the children?
If you care, you can help Green-Aid help the Naulls to fight this alarming case. It's time to stop the war on children and parents. DONATE NOW!
-----------------------------------------------------------
From: Ronnie Naulls
Date: August 24, 2010 8:20:13 PM PDT
Subject: Sentencing (This Is It)
Hello Everyone,
Well there is most likely a 99.9% chance the final chapter of Healing Nations Collective of Corona, CA will be written.
On Monday August 30th, at 8:30am my sentencing will commence. I'm sure the Judge will be well prepared for our impending turnout wearing our ribbons of solidarity. This may well be the last Medical Marijuana prosecution, conviction and sentencing in Riverside County as we know it. It would be all the more humbling to be formally sentenced as a convict with supporters, patients, family and friends there from the beginning till the end. It brings me to tears as I reflect on how long and uncertain the journey has been over the past 3 years and that it will end on Monday. If I had to do it all over again I wouldn't change a thing. Thank you everyone for your support, guidance, emotionally, physically and financially. We (The Naulls Family) could not have done it without YOU!
God Bless and look forward to seeing you all on Monday.
U.S. District & Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California
Courtroom Judge Virginia Phillips - 3470 Twelfth St - Riverside, CA 92501 - 8:30am
Regards,
-Ronald Bradley Naulls
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
ASA Mixer and Social Gathering - La Jolla Brew House
At 6pm, please join Americans for Safe Access at the La Jolla Brew House Restaurant for an ASA Mixer and Social Hour.
ASA Mixer / Social Hour
WHAT: ASA Mixer
WHEN: 8/24/2010 - 6pm
WHERE: La Jolla Brew House - 7536 Fay Avenue La Jolla, CA 92037
Help make the San Diego Community Liaison program thrive. Donate now
The ASA Community Liaisons focus on three primary objectives:
1. Provides services, information, and training to medical cannabis patients,
2. Assists in establishing safe access legislation and regulation,
3. Builds the ASA sponsorship program to fund efforts to achieve safe access for every American.
Tonight's ASA Mixer come meet Raudel Wilson the Community Liaison Manager for Americans for Safe Access, and Eugene Davidovich, the new Community Liaison for the San Diego Area to socialize and learn how both patients, professionals, lawyers, doctor's, and Medical Cannabis Dispensing Collective/Cooperative (MCDC) can become an ASA Sponsor, get involved and help the effort to achieve safe access in San Diego and for every American!
www.safeaccesssd.org | www.safeaccessnow.org
Monday, August 23, 2010
New Indictment Filed in Stacy Federal Medical Marijuana Case
San Diego, CA – Last week, days before trial was to start, Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Schopler filed a second superseding indictment in Federal Court against James Stacy. The indictment includes two new charges and the modification of one of the previous charges. The paperwork was filed with the court on Thursday afternoon giving the defense less than 24 hours notice and no time to prepare a response.
James Stacy, a San Diego-area medical marijuana provider was raided in September 2009 by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Last month, U.S. District Court Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz denied a defense for Stacy who was raided a month before the Justice Department issued a new policy on medical marijuana in October, deemphasizing federal enforcement in medical marijuana states.
Despite the new policy, the Obama Administration is continuing its prosecution against Stacy, who was originally supposed to go to trial on August 30th as the first such trial under the new DOJ policy.
“This new indictment makes it a third round of charges against Mr. Stacy and is a clear sign of the vindictive and biased nature of the prosecution in this case”, said Terrie Best, a long time patient advocate and member of San Diego Americans for Safe Access.
These underhanded prosecutorial tactics surprised everyone in the courtroom last Friday, including Judge Moskowitz, who in light of the new charges being so close to the trial date, in a rare move, offered to sever the new charges from the current case. According to Judge Moskowitz in the last fifteen years he has only offered to do this once and he believed that the circumstances of the Stacy case called for such a move if requested by the defense.
Stacy’s supporters present in the courtroom that day were shocked and outraged at Schopler and the distance he was willing to go to get a conviction.
Mr. Stacy’s Attorneys asked the court for time to consider the offer to sever the new charges, as well as more time to prepare for the case now in light of the new indictment. The judge agreed and asked everyone to come back on Tuesday, August 24 at 2pm to further discuss the new trial date and any motions the defense may wish to bring forward in response to the new indictment.
The denial of Stacy's medical marijuana defense in federal court as well as the vindictive nature of this prosecution has attracted the attention of some Members of Congress who are working to end this unfair practice. "Despite a new Justice Department policy on medical marijuana enforcement, James Stacy was still denied a defense in federal court," Congressman Sam Farr (D-CA), author of HR3939, the Truth in Trials Act, said in a previous statement. Farr also said the Truth in Trials legislation would allow defendants like Stacy to use evidence of state law compliance in federal court, and “would correct this aberration of justice and ensure that no one else will needlessly face years in prison without the means to defend themselves."
"After the most recent Grand Jury report urging our local government to stop obstructing the implementation of state law and adopt a sensible medical marijuana policy in San Diego, the Stacy persecution -- his denial of a defense and the new indictment -- undermines the will of California voters who overwhelmingly support Proposition 215 and patient’s rights to access the medicine that helps them,” said Marcus Boyd of San Diego ASA. “The new indictment against Stacy is clearly a vindictive attempt to instill fear into the medical marijuana community, rather than try a case according to law.”
The Stacy trial and recent DEA raids come as the City and County of San Diego are both deliberating local regulations on distribution of medical marijuana. Advocates argue that federal actions in collaboration with local law enforcement aim to undermine efforts to regulate the same activity that's being criminalized. San Diego has historically been hostile to medical marijuana, filing a lawsuit against local advocates and the State of California to avoid implementing the state-mandated ID card system and conducting more than 50 DEA raids during the Bush Administration. Yet, patients and advocates have been supported by two San Diego Grand Juries that have issued strong recommendations to fully implement state law at the local level.
Stacy will be back in Federal Court on Tuesday August 24 at 2pm in Courtroom 15, where the new trial date and other details of the case will be resolved.
Further Information:
Second Superseding Indictment
Ruling by federal judge denying Stacy's defense:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Stacy_Ruling.pdf
October 2009 Justice Department policy directive on medical marijuana:
http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192
Friday, August 20, 2010
James Stacy Court Support
Please come out and support James Stacy in Court on FRIDAY August 20 at 11:30am!
WHAT: James Stacy Federal Medical Marijuana (Final Pre-Trial Hearing)
WHEN: 11:30am 8/20/2010
WHERE: 940 Front St. San Diego CA 92101 (Courtroom 15)
Get there early as the courtroom fills up fast! This is a critical Federal trial that has garnered national attention and support from both concerned citizens, members of Congress, and the nation’s largest medical marijuana advocacy group, Americans for Safe Access.
On July 13th, 2010, U.S. District Court Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz denied a defense for James Stacy, a San Diego-area medical marijuana provider raided in September 2009 by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Bonnie Dumanis' Narcotics Task Force. Stacy was raided by the DEA a month before the Justice Department issued a new policy on medical marijuana in October, deemphasizing federal enforcement in medical marijuana states. Despite the new policy, the Obama Administration is continuing its prosecution against Stacy, who will be tried on August 30th as the first such trial under the new DOJ policy.
"It's far worse to then deny the accused a defense in federal court, all but guaranteeing a conviction in spite of the defendant's compliance with state law." Because of a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, the federal government can effectively exclude any evidence of medical use or compliance with state medical marijuana laws.
The denial of Stacy's medical marijuana defense in federal court has attracted the attention of some Members of Congress who are working to end this unfair practice. "Despite a new Justice Department policy on medical marijuana enforcement, James Stacy was still denied a defense in federal court," said Congressman Sam Farr (D-CA), author of HR3939, the Truth in Trials Act, legislation that would allow defendants like Stacy to use evidence of state law compliance in federal court. "The Truth in Trials Act would correct this aberration of justice and ensure that no one else will needlessly face years in prison without the means to defend themselves."
The Stacy trial and recent DEA raids come as the City and County of San Diego are both deliberating local regulations on distribution of medical marijuana. Advocates argue that federal actions in collaboration with local law enforcement aim to undermine efforts to regulate the same activity that's being criminalized. San Diego has historically been hostile to medical marijuana, filing a lawsuit against local advocates and the State of California to avoid implementing the state-mandated ID card system and conducting more than 50 DEA raids during the Bush Administration. Yet, patients and advocates have been supported by two San Diego Grand Juries that have issued strong recommendations to fully implement state law at the local level.
"Stacy's prosecution and denial of a defense underscores the importance of developing a comprehensive federal policy on medical marijuana, which will also allow states to care for the health and welfare of their people without unnecessary federal interference," continued Woodson. "It's not the purview of the federal government to enforce local or state laws."
Further Information:
Ruling by federal judge denying Stacy's defense:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Stacy_Ruling.pdf
October 2009 Justice Department policy directive on medical marijuana:
http://blogs.usdoj.gov/blog/archives/192
Wednesday, August 18, 2010
California Appellate Court Reinstates Medical Marijuana Dispensary Ban Case
State law & AG guidelines allowing for local distribution validated and remain in effect
The unanimous decision, authored by Judge Richard Aronson, reversed the trial court's ruling that federal law preempts state law, but failed to rule on whether Anaheim's local ordinance could preempt the state's Medical Marijuana Program Act (MMPA). The ruling states that because Proposition 215 and the MMPA "do not mandate conduct that federal law prohibits, nor pose an obstacle to federal enforcement of federal law, the enactments' decriminalization provisions are not preempted by federal law." In a statement favorable to the plaintiff, the court questions how "a city may criminalize as a misdemeanor a particular use of property the state expressly has exempted from 'criminal liability,'" as it does in the MMPA.
"While we understand the difficult nature of deciding this issue, the court's ruling delays a decision that will affect thousands of patients who remain without access to their medication because of hostile jurisdictions," said Joe Elford, Chief Counsel with Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country's leading medical marijuana patient advocacy group, which filed briefs in the Anaheim case and argued before the Court of Appeal last September. "The silver lining to this decision is that the court has reinstated the lawsuit and is providing the plaintiffs the opportunity to prove that dispensary bans are illegal under state law."
The case Qualified Patients Association v. City of Anaheim was the result of a lawsuit filed shortly after Anaheim voted to ban dispensaries in July of 2007. Qualified Patients Association was a local medical marijuana dispensary that had been in operation for 5 months prior to the ban. An appeal was filed in March of 2008 after the Orange County Superior Court ruled that Anaheim could prohibit dispensaries from operating within its city limits.
The Anaheim case has drawn a lot of attention as more and more local governments have been forced to confront the issue of access to medical marijuana. Despite guidelines recognizing the legality of storefront dispensaries issued in August of 2008 by the California Attorney General, multiple statewide law enforcement associations filed briefs in support of Anaheim's ban, as did nearly three-dozen cities.
"We will continue to fight for the right of patients to access medical marijuana through medical marijuana dispensaries, which is provided for by the Medical Marijuana Program Act, previous case law and guidelines issued by the California Attorney General," continued Elford. "Whether or not the Anaheim case is brought before this court again, this issue will eventually be reheard and we are confident of the eventual outcome."
Further Information:
Today's ruling in Qualified Patients Association v. City of Anaheim:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Anaheim_Ruling.pdf
Status of California city ordinances regulating and banning dispensaries:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/regulations
Monday, August 16, 2010
Rx Cannabis Raid Relief Expo and Concert (First in a series?)
By: Dan Murphy and Eugene Davidovich, San Diego Americans for Safe Access
The Rx Cannabis Raid Relief Concert and Expo organized by James Stacy, Saturday afternoon, was a tremendous success. The event will help pave the road for a series of educational expos and seminars planned for the San Diego area in the next few months by a number of organizations, and helped open a new chapter in medical marijuana activism in San Diego.
The Club Ballroom was host to the event, situated in the heart of historic Palisades Area of Balboa Park. Upon entering the Ballroom, around 4 pm the whole building was alive with activity. Exhibitors helping each other put the finishing touches on their booths, speakers preparing for their presentations, and James Stacy running around making sure everything was running smoothly.
There were dozens of exhibitor tables arranged with aisles big enough to dance in, Just Ask Henry Hemp, who was there representing The Hemp Network and debuting his new Adventures of Henry Hemp comic book.
Jovan Jackson, one of the founding members of Answerdam collective, preparing for his second jury trial in less than a year was there to support James Stacy and garner support for his own legal defense.
As the doors opened to the public and the people started to pour in, positive energy filled the room and was maintained throughout the entire event. It was refreshing to see NORML, ASA, LEAP, DPA, SSDP, and other groups, all working together to help spread the word and educate the community about medical cannabis and the outrageous prosecutions and raids against legitimate medical cannabis patients in San Diego.
Laura R and Tim B, recent victims of Dumanis’ fierce fight against medical marijuana and victims of a raid on their home in Encinitas were also beneficiaries of the proceeds from this event. They were on hand to help spread the word in the park about the event, and help with the breakdown and clean up of the event. They are currently facing charges, going through court proceedings, and facing a difficult road against this bias driven persecution.
The event started with an introduction and a brief speech by James Stacy in which he welcomed everyone and thanked the community for their support. The lecture and band series began with Mr. Leo E. Lawrence of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), who spoke about the failures of the drug war and the need for serious reform of our current drug laws. Mr. Lawrence’s speech was followed by
Roswell That Ends Well, a local San Diego band who kept the room entertained with the latest SD Punk music for over 30 minutes.
Reverend Wayne Riggs of the San Diego Medical Marijuana Task Force continued the lecture series with a discussion about the need for sensible regulations in San Diego. His speech was followed by Attorney Lance Rogers who spoke about Proposition 19.
Even Stephen Whitburn Candidate for San Diego County Board of Supervisors and Vice Chair of the San Diego Medical Marijuana Task Force stopped by and spoke for a few minutes to the crowd.
When Registered Nurse Lanny Swerdlow began presenting “Cannabis to Slow Aging”, a 45 minute presentation about the medical efficacy and benefits of medical marijuana, the seats in front of the stage quickly filled up.
Following the speeches, Will Faeber of Cathouse Thursday filled the room with great adult contemporary music which helped maintain the fun and energetic atmosphere of the expo. The bands CD’s were available for purchase at the Expo, and Will Faeber aside from putting on an amazing performance, himself MC’d the event, introduced speakers, as well as helped raffle of tons of prizes including a “Rasta” colored Beach Cruiser donated by Kim and Thor from Mother Earth Collective and Coop in San Diego.
Other highlights of the evening included a money booth sponsored by Ideal Choice Insurance, a Jamaican Restaurant serving up authentic Caribbean food, a Hydroponics Bucket System Display setup by Custom Hydroponics, gardening and educational books by Ed Rosenthal, a masseuse conducting chair massages, and several Doctor’s office discussing the benefits of medical marijuana with patients.
At the Americans for Safe Access (ASA) booth, Vey Linville was selling Protest Posters to raise funds for Mr. Stacy, Dan Murphy was coordinating the “I am a Patient” picture campaign and Larry Sweet of the San Diego Medical Marijuana Task Force was educating the public about the mission of ASA.
The evening’s last performance was a band called Shame and Scandall, who completely blew the crowd away with a spectacular performance of Ska music, lead by lead singer Steven Bartholow.
The proceeds raised from this event will directly help James Stacy, Laura and Tim who are all facing charges, Mr. Stacy in Federal Court, and Laura and Tim in State Court.
Mr. Stacy hopes to keep up the momentum generated by this event with a series of events like this to help spread education and awareness throughout the San Diego Community, as well as help financially support defendants while going through trials.
Mr Stacy is back in court this week and will be facing a trial where he was denied the right to tell the entire truth and will not even be able to discuss California Laws relating to Medical Marijuana.
His next hearing is scheduled for August 20, 2010, at 11:30 in Courtroom 15 at the San Diego Federal Court House located at 940 Front St.
San Diego DA Moves to Deny Medical Marijuana Defense in Second Trial of Jovan Jackson
Patient advocates file amicus brief, challenging the prosecution's assertion that sales are illegal
San Diego, CA -- Despite being acquitted by a jury late last year of charges stemming from a 2008 arrest on marijuana possession and distribution charges, medical marijuana patient and provider Jovan Jackson is being tried by San Diego District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis for a second time in less than a year. However, for the second trial Dumanis is trying to deny Jackson, the former operator of Answerdam Alternative Care Collective (AACC), a medical marijuana defense based on the claim that "sales" are illegal under state law. Americans for Safe Access (ASA), the country's leading medical marijuana patient advocacy group filed an amicus (friend of the court) brief in support of Jackson's defense, refuting the District Attorney's allegations.
"To deny a medical marijuana provider the ability to defend himself in court based on an argument that what he did was illegal, not only ignores relevant medical marijuana law, but also smacks of circular logic," said Joe Elford, ASA Chief Counsel and author of the amicus brief filed today. "Dumanis appears against the wall in trying to prove her ill-reasoned legal theory and is attempting anything that will give her the advantage at trial."
Dumanis has suffered two major losses related to medical marijuana trials within the last year. In addition to Jackson's acquittal in December 2009, Eugene Davidovich, another San Diego medical marijuana was acquitted of similar charges in March of this year. Both Jackson and Davidovich were arrested in a multi-agency law enforcement raid in September 2009. "One would think that after two trials, hundreds of thousands of taxpayers' dollars wasted and her reputation damaged, that Ms. Dumanis would reconsider her approach," said Davidovich in a previous statement on the matter.
The brief filed today by ASA relies on three main pillars, which establish the legality of medical marijuana sales. First, the legislature passed the Medical Marijuana Program Act (SB 420) in 2003, exempting collectives and cooperatives from being prosecuted under the State's marijuana "sales" statute as well as "maintaining a place where sales occur." Second, California's Third District Court of Appeal affirmed in 2005 the newly established law under the MMPA and that sales were in fact legal under state law. Finally, in August 2008, the California Attorney General issued guidelines which stated that collectives and cooperatives may "[a]llocate marijuana based on fees that are reasonably calculated to cover overhead costs and operating expenses."
In the lead-up to Jackson's first trial, Dumanis was embarrassed by the disclosure that San Diego Deputy District Attorneys James Pitts was a member patient of Jackson's dispensary, and had purchased medicine there on multiple occasions with the recommendation of his physician. The hearing on motions in limine to decide whether Jackson can use a medical marijuana defense will occur on Wednesday in San Diego Superior Court, at which time Jackson's trial will also be scheduled.
Further Information:
Amicus brief filed today by ASA in support of Jovan Jackson:
http://AmericansForSafeAccess.org/downloads/Amicus_Jackson_Trial.pdf
# # #
With over 50,000 active members in all 50 states, Americans for Safe Access (ASA) is the largest national member-based organization of patients, medical professionals, scientists and concerned citizens promoting safe and legal access to cannabis for therapeutic use and research. ASA works to overcome political and legal barriers by creating policies that improve access to medical cannabis for patients and researchers through legislation, education, litigation, grassroots actions, advocacy and services for patients and the caregivers.
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Manager of marijuana collective facing second drug trial in a year
The community is outraged at this continued waste of taxpayers’ dollars and will be there in court to support Mr. Jackson throughout his ordeal and bias driven persecution.
Please come out on August 16, 2010 at 8:15am in Department 11 to show your support for Mr. Jackson.
WHAT: Jovan Jackson Court Support
WHEN: August 16, 2010 – 8:15am
WHERE: San Diego Superior Court – 220 W. Broadway, San Diego CA 92101 (Department 11)
Manager of marijuana collective facing second drug trial in a year
By Dana Littlefield, UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
Jovan Jackson has been cutting men’s hair since he was a teenager. But a few years back, he decided to take a sharp detour from the barber trade and try a different vocation.
A medical marijuana patient himself, he joined with a small group of others to start a marijuana collective called Answerdam Alternative Care. He served as manager. It was a legal venture, he believed, made possible under California law.
But for Jackson, it was a decision that ultimately landed him in court.
For the second time in less than a year, Jackson, 32, is headed to trial on charges of illegally possessing and selling marijuana. The charges stem from a raid at the Kearny Mesa dispensary in September. In December, he was acquitted of similar charges related to an earlier raid on the same property.
Pretrial motions are expected to begin this week in San Diego Superior Court.
READ MORE...
Friday, August 13, 2010
North County ASA Meeting Friday!
Join Americans for Safe Access in North County San Diego for the August North County ASA Meeting!
This month we are excited to bring you the latest news about medical marijuana from around the nation, the state, and San Diego County.
Here are some highlights of what to expect at the Friday Meeting:
- Latest information with the San Diego City Cease and Desist situation as well as our Campaign to urge the Mayor to participate.
- Update on County Ordinance and Licensing Process (Unincorporated Areas)
- Latest update on James Stacy’s Federal Medical Marijuana Trial that has garnered nationwide support.
- Rx Cannabis Raid Relief Update
- Safe Access in the South Bay Discussion / Strategy
- Get Involved, Get Active
WHEN: 8/13/2010 – 7pm-8:30pm
WHERE: 950 E. Vista Way Vista, Ca 92084 STE A2
San Diego Americans for Safe Access
www.SafeAccessSD.org
Get Involved, get active, make a difference!
Join ASA - www.safeaccessnow.org
Thursday, August 12, 2010
South Bay ASA Meeting - Tonight - 6-7pm
Join Americans for Safe Access in South Bay San Diego for our monthly meeting!
This month we are excited to bring you the latest news about medical marijuana from around the nation, the state, and San Diego County.
Here are some highlights of what to expect at Thursday’s Meeting:
- Latest information with the San Diego City Cease and Desist situation as well as our Campaign to urge the Mayor to participate.
- Update on County Ordinance and Licensing Process (Unincorporated Areas)
- Latest update on James Stacy’s Federal Medical Marijuana Trial that has garnered nationwide support.
- Rx Cannabis Raid Relief Update
- Safe Access in the South Bay Discussion / Strategy
- Get Involved, Get Active
WHEN: 8/12/2010 – 6-7pm
WHERE: 1233 Palm Avneue, Imperial Beach, CA
San Diego Americans for Safe Access
www.SafeAccessSD.org
Get Involved, get active, make a difference!
Join ASA - www.safeaccessnow.org
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
CHRONIC-CON? - Rx Cannabis Raid Relief Concert and Expo
Benefits of Dispensaries to the Patient Community
DISPENSARIES PROVIDE MANY BENEFITS TO THE SICK AND SUFFERING
Americans For Safe Access
Safe and legal access to cannabis is the reason dispensaries have been created by patients and caregivers around the state. For many people, dispensaries remove significant barriers to their ability to obtain cannabis. Patients in urban areas with no space to cultivate cannabis, those without the requisite gardening skills to grow their own, and, most critically, those who face the sudden onset of a serious illness or who have suffered a catastrophic illness — all tend to rely on dispensaries as a compassionate, community-based solution that is an alternative to potentially dangerous illicit market transactions.
Many elected officials around the state recognize the importance of dispensaries for their constituents. As Nathan Miley, former Oakland City councilmember and now Alameda County supervisor said in a letter to his colleagues, "When designing regulations, it is crucial to remember that at its core this is a healthcare issue, requiring the involvement and leadership of local departments of public health. A pro-active healthcare-based approach can effectively address problems before they arise, and communities can design methods for safe, legal access to medical marijuana while keeping the patients' needs foremost."
Likewise, Abbe Land, mayor of West Hollywood says safe access is "very important" and long-time councilmember John Duran agreed, adding, "We have a very high number of HIV-positive residents in our area. Some of them require medical marijuana to offset the medications they take for HIV." Jane Bender, mayor of Santa Rosa, says, "There are legitimate patients in our community, and I'm glad they have a safe means of obtaining their medicine."
Oakland's city administrator for ordinances, said safe access to cannabis is "very important" for the community. "In the finding the council made to justify the ordinance, they say 'have safe and affordable access'."
And Mike Rotkin, the longtime Santa Cruz elected official, said that this is also an important matter for his city's citizens: "The council considers it a high priority and has taken considerable heat to speak out and act on the issue."
It was a similar decision of social conscience that lead to Placerville's city council putting a regulatory ordinance in place. Councilmember Marian Washburn told her colleagues that "as you get older, you know people with diseases who suffer terribly, so that is probably what I get down to after considering all the other components."
While dispensaries provide a unique way for patients to obtain the cannabis their doctors have recommended, they typically offer far more that is of benefit to the health and welfare of those suffering both chronic and acute medical problems.
Dispensaries are often called "clubs" in part because many of them offer far more than a clinical setting for obtaining cannabis. Recognizing the isolation that many seriously ill and injured people experience, many dispensary operators chose to offer a wider array of social services, including everything from a place to congregate and socialize to help with finding housing and meals. The social support patients receive in these settings has far-reaching benefits that is also influencing the development of other patient-based care models.
RESEARCH SUPPORTS THE DISPENSARY MODEL
A 2006 study by Amanda Reiman, Ph.D. of the School of Social Welfare at the University of California, Berkeley examined the experience of 130 patients spread among seven different dispensaries in the San Francisco Bay Area. Dr. Reiman's study cataloged the patients' demographic information, health status, consumer satisfaction, and use of services, while also considering the dispensaries' environment, staff, and services offered. The study found that "medical cannabis patients have created a system of dispensing medical cannabis that also includes services such as counseling, entertainment and support groups, all important components of coping with chronic illness." She also found that levels of satisfaction with the care received at dispensaries ranked significantly higher than those reported for health care nationally.
Patients who use the dispensaries studied uniformly reported being well satisfied with the services they received, giving an 80% satisfaction rating. The most important factors for patients in choosing a medical cannabis dispensary were: feeling comfortable and secure, familiarity with the dispensary, and having a rapport with the staff. In their comments, patients tended to note the helpfulness and kindness of staff and the support found in the presence of other patients.
Patients in Dr. Reiman's study frequently cited their relationships with staff as a positive factor. Comments from six different dispensaries include:
"I love this spot because of the love they give, always! They treat everyone like a family loved one!"
"This particular establishment is very friendly for the most part and very convenient for me."
"The staff and patients are like family to me!"
"The staff are warm and respectful."
"The staff at this facility are always cordial and very friendly. I enjoy coming."
"This is the friendliest dispensary that I have ever been to and the staff is always warm and open. That's why I keep coming to this place. The selection is always wide."
MANY DISPENSARIES PROVIDE KEY SOCIAL SERVICES
Dispensaries offer many cannabis-related services that patients cannot otherwise obtain. Among them is an array of cannabis varieties, some of which are more useful for certain afflictions than others, and staff awareness of what types of cannabis other patients report to be helpful. In other words, one variety of cannabis may be effective for pain control while another may be better for combating nausea. Dispensaries allow for the pooling of information about these differences and the opportunity to access the type of cannabis likely to be most beneficial.
________________________________________
"There are legitimate patients in our community, and I'm glad they have a safe means of obtaining their medicine."
—Jane Bender, Santa Rosa
________________________________________
Other cannabis-related services include the availability of cannabis products in other forms than the smokeable ones. While most patients prefer to have the ability to modulate dosing that smoking easily allows, for others, the effects of edible cannabis products are preferable. Dispensaries typically offer edible products such as brownies or cookies for those purposes. Many dispensaries also offer classes on how to grow your own cannabis, classes on legal matters, trainings for health-care advocacy, and other seminars.
Beyond providing safe and legal access to cannabis, the dispensaries studied also offer important social services to patients, including counseling, help with housing and meals, hospice and other care referrals, and, in one case, even doggie daycare for members who have doctor appointments or work commitments. Among the broader services the study found in dispensaries are support groups, including groups for women, veterans, and men; creativity and art groups, including groups for writers, quilters, crochet, and crafts; and entertainment options, including bingo, open mike nights, poetry readings, internet access, libraries, and puzzles. Clothing drives and neighborhood parties are among the activities that patients can also participate in through their dispensary.
Social services such as counseling and support groups were reported to be the most commonly and regularly used service, with two-thirds of patients reporting that they use social services at dispensaries 1-2 times per week. Also, life services, such as free food and housing help, were used at least once or twice a week by 22% of those surveyed.
________________________________________
"Local government has a responsibility to the medical needs of its people, even when it's not a politically easy choice to make. We have found it possible to build regulations that address the concerns of neighbors, local businesses law enforcement and the general public, while not compromising the needs of the patients themselves. We've found that by working with all interested parities in advance of adopting an ordinance while keeping the patients' needs foremost, problems that may seem inevitable never arise."
—Nancy Nadel, Oakland
________________________________________
Dispensaries offer chronically ill patients even more than safe and legal access to cannabis and an array of social services. The study found that dispensaries also provided other social benefits for the chronically ill, an important part of the bigger picture:
[T]he multiple services provided by the social model are only part of the culture of social club facility. Another component of this model … is the possible benefit that social support has for one diagnosed with a chronic and/or terminal physical or psychological illness. Beyond the support that medical cannabis patients receive from services is the support received from fellow patients, some of whom are experiencing the same or similar physical/psychological symptoms…. It is possible that the mental health benefits from the social support of fellow patients is an important part of the healing process, separate from the medicinal value of the cannabis itself.
Several researchers and physicians who have studied the issue of the patient experience with dispensaries have concluded that there are other important positive effects stemming from a dispensary model that includes a component of social support groups.
Dr. Reiman notes that, "support groups may have the ability to address issues besides the illness itself that might contribute to long-term physical and emotional health outcomes, such as the prevalence of depression among the chronically ill."
For those who suffer the most serious illness, such as HIV/AIDS and terminal cancer, these groups of like-minded people with similar conditions can also help patients through the grieving process. Other research into the patient experience has found that many patients have lost or are losing friends and partners to terminal illness. These patients report finding solace with other patients who are also grieving or facing end-of-life decisions. A medical study published in 1998 concluded that the patient-to-patient contact associated with the social club model was the best therapeutic setting for ill people.
CONCLUSION
Dispensaries are proving to be an asset to the communities they serve, as well as the larger community within which they operate.
ASA's survey of local officials and monitoring of regulatory activity throughout the State of California has shown that, once working regulatory ordinances are in place, dispensaries are typically viewed favorably by public officials, neighbors, businesses, and the community at large, and that regulatory ordinances can and do improve an area, both socially and economically.
Dispensaries - now expressly legal under California state law - are helping revitalize neighborhoods by reducing crime and bringing new customers to surrounding businesses. They improve public safety by increasing the security presence in neighborhoods, reducing illicit market marijuana sales, and ensuring that any criminal activity gets reported to the appropriate law enforcement authorities.
More importantly, dispensaries benefit the community by providing safe access for those who have the greatest difficulty getting the medicine their doctors recommend: the most seriously ill and injured. Many dispensaries also offer essential services to patients, such as help with food and housing.
Medical and public health studies have also shown that the social-club model of most dispensaries is of significant benefit to the overall health of patients. The result is that cannabis patients rate their satisfaction with dispensaries as far greater than the customer-satisfaction ratings given to health care agencies in general.
Public officials across the state, in both urban and rural communities where dispensary regulatory ordinances have been adopted, have been outspoken in praise of what. Their comments are consistent on and favorable to the regulatory schemes they enacted and the benefits to the patients and others living in their communities.
As a compassionate, community-based response to the medical needs of more than 150,000 sick and suffering Californians, dispensaries are working.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Second Medical Marijuana Trial - Jovan Jackson
First it was the Jovan Jackson medical marijuana trial where Mr. Jackson was vindicated of all the marijuana charges against him. Following the Jackson verdict a few months later another jury found Eugene Davidovich not guilty of all counts. In both cases, the defendants were founding members of their respective collectives.
One would think that after two trials, hundreds of thousands of taxpayers’ dollars wasted, and her reputation damaged, that Ms. Dumanis would reconsider her approach, or at the least create a guideline for patients to follow and avoid prosecution when they are following the law.
Unfortunately, it appears that her office has not learned anything from the trials and is ramping up for more prosecutions.
Albert Einstein once said that "Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is the definition of insanity".
Ms. Dumanis has now partnered up in her efforts against patients with Steve Cooley, the Los Angeles District Attorney and candidate for California Attorney General in the November election. Mr. Cooley is a staunch anti-marijuana propagandist and has made it his life’s passion to prove that marijuana has no medicinal value.
Using a tactic directly from Cooley’s persecution playbook, Ms. Dumanis has decided to file new charges against Mr. Jackson for the same thing he was already vindicated of once.
This week, the Jackson defense team issued the following statement:
Please be advised that on August 16, 2010 criminal proceedings will begin for People v. Jovan Jackson, the San Diego District Attorney’s second case against a member of “Answerdam”, a medical marijuana collective in Kearny Mesa.
On August 5, 2008, San Diego Police Department officers and Federal Drug Enforcement Administration agents raided the Answerdam office on Convoy Court, seizing computers, patient files, and approximately five pounds of medical cannabis. Mr. Jackson, an Answerdam member, was later arrested at his home in San Diego.
While that case was pending, Answerdam was raided again on September 9, 2009 during a countywide sweep of medical marijuana facilities. Jackson is charged with felony possession of marijuana and sales of marijuana in connection with that raid.
On December 1, 2009, Jackson was acquitted of all marijuana charges by a jury for the 2008 raid. The District Attorney has refused to dismiss the charges related to the 2009 raid.
In 1996, California voters enacted the Compassionate Use Act which legalized marijuana use for personal medical purposes. The Medical Marijuana Program Act of 2003 clarified the CUA and specifically authorized “collective” cultivation among patients for medical purposes. In 2008, the State Attorney General issued guidelines for the security and non-diversion of marijuana. Those guidelines specifically authorize the lawful operation of a marijuana collective to cultivate and distribute medical cannabis. Shortly after the local raids, the U.S. Attorney General’s Office issued a memorandum stating that medical marijuana collectives in compliance with state law would not be prosecuted by the federal government.
This is an authorized statement from Mr. Jackson’s defense team.
Lance Rogers, Attorney for Jovan Jackson
110 West C Street, Ste 1414 San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone (619) 232-2311 | Facsimile (619) 232-2312
The community is outraged at this continued waste of taxpayers’ dollars and will be there in court to support Mr. Jackson throughout his ordeal and bias driven persecution. Please come out on August 16, 2010 at 8:15am in Department 11 to show your support for Mr. Jackson.
WHAT: Jovan Jackson Court Support
WHEN: August 16, 2010 – 8:15am
WHERE: San Diego Superior Court – 220 W. Broadway, San Diego CA 92101 (Department 11)
San Diego Americans for Safe Access - www.safeaccesssd.org
Join ASA - www.safeaccessnow.org
Monday, August 9, 2010
San Diego ASA August Meeting – Tuesday 7-9pm – La Jolla Brew House
Please join us for the August San Diego Chapter of Americans for Safe Access monthly meeting.
WHEN: TUESDAY August 10th, 2010 7pm-9pm
WHERE: La Jolla Brew House - 7536 Fay Avenue La Jolla, CA 92037
This month we are excited to bring you the latest news about medical marijuana from around the nation, the state, and San Diego County.
Here are some highlights of what to expect at Tuesday’s Meeting:
- Latest information with the San Diego City Cease and Desist situation as well as our Campaign to urge the Mayor to participate.
- Update on County Ordinance and Licensing Process (Unincorporated Areas)
- Latest update on James Stacy’s Federal Medical Marijuana Trial that has garnered nationwide support.
- Discussion about Proposition 19 impact on Medical Marijuana
- Legal Cannabis Institute “Tip of the Month”
We look forward to seeing everyone at the La Jolla Brew House!
San Diego Americans for Safe Access
http://www.safeaccesssd.org/
Get Involved, get active, make a difference!
Join ASA - http://www.safeaccessnow.org/
Sunday, August 8, 2010
BORDER PATROL ABUSE OF MEDICAL MARIJUANA PATIENTS
Please contact me, or share my story with anyone that may be able to help me as my situation is urgent and my time very short!
Charles R. Berg - 1230 C.N. Perry Calexico, CA. 92231 - Crberg2@juno.com
As a medically retired firefighter from the City of Fresno Calif. I was injured in the line of duty, suffering injuries at a chemical factory fire. I have had to undergo over 5 major spinal surgeries and countless therapies and endless treatment for the chronic injuries and diseases that the chemical exposures and trauma caused. I have sought the services of medical professionals around the country over the last 10 years and was very lucky and blessed to find treatment and medications that have allowed me to live a somewhat functional life while living with the chronic pain.
In 2006, one of my doctors, a specialist in Arthritis and chronic pain suggested to me to consider living in a dry, warm climate to help ease the symptoms of arthritis. The blessing in this was that some of the best doctors of Arthritis practice in Palm Springs and San Diego California, and that I have friends and family in the area that were very happy to help me. The move and my pain relief became immediate and I fell into a very happy routine of living in the remote town of Calexico Calif. and traveling to see the specialist and physical therapists that were treating my injuries in Palm Springs, San Diego and Phoenix.
Out of necessity and because of the distances I travel to see the numerous medical specialists that treat me, I often need to plan on traveling and staying in local hotels for a few days to make myself available for the extensive tests and treatments needed over several days. Having numerous chronic injuries and illnesses also requires me to take the numerous medications I am prescribed on the trip with me. I had finally settled into my new home and had started to make the numerous trips to doctors and physical therapists and began to see marked improvements in my health. Very quickly I had become more active and lost over 50 pounds which I had gained over the years after my injury due to the pain and inactivity. The luck in finding the right doctors also resulted in a marked decrease in the number of prescription drugs I was taking; having to take only a few, specialized medications.
It was only within a few months of settling into my home and routine in Calexico California that my life was completely changed and my thoughts about this Countries attitude toward freedom and Civil Rights was shaken to its foundations. Because of my remote location, I need to travel to see the medical specialists that treat me, so that I can live in a healthier climate. Calexico is located right on the Mexican border in Southern Calif. within 40 miles of the Arizona border. Travel in any direction and its necessary to pass through several Inspection Stations along the way; California has its agricultural inspections stations, and the U.S. Border Patrol has its immigration check stations. I became accustom to the routine of passing through them, telling the officers and Agents that, “no, I do not have any fresh fruits or vegetables,” or “yes, I am a U.S. citizen.” This all seemed fine at the time, and although I found the waiting for over 30 min. to pass through to be an irritation, and the occasional accident in the dark by people not prepared for cars to be at a stop on the Highway, seemed only minor problems at the time. It was in Mid. 2006, around the month of August that everything changed.
I was scheduled for physical therapy in Palm Springs over the weekend. On any of these trips I would leave Friday evening and spend the weekend in a motel, returning home the evening of my doctors’ visit in order to help break up the long drive. When driving from Calexico to Palm Springs, there is a U.S. Border Patrol station on Hwy. 86 near the Salton Sea. Leaving on a Friday evening I was expecting some delays and left early because I had pre-tests scheduled, but this particular evening the line was several miles long and the wait nearly an hour. After waiting and moving up to the front, I noticed that Border Patrol Agents were using a dog or K-9 and were having it run around every vehicle. It became obvious to me that all the time they were taking to run the dog around the vehicles was what was causing the delay, but what came next was not so obvious. The K-9 was searching vehicles 4-5 back from the front of the line but when it got to me the dog and Agent stayed with my vehicle, and upon reaching the front I was stopped. The Agent directing traffic told me to pull over to the side, I started to inquire as to what was going on but was interrupted with a sharp command to, “PULL OVER NOW!!” I complied immediately and was followed by the K-9 and handler. I was told to get out of the vehicle and to present my I.D., all of which I did immediately. Every time I asked what was wrong I would be interrupted with shouts of “shut up” or commands to “sit down.” When agents began to search the vehicle and the dog jumped into my car, I stood up and said, “Wait a minute, do you have a warrant to do that?” I was immediately restrained and handcuffed. Agents explained to me that I was under arrest because the K-9 had alerted to my vehicle and they were searching for what it alerted to. I was taken inside and bodily searched; my clothing was checked and I was patted down. I was then taken outside and handcuffed to a bench while my vehicle was searched for over an hour. I was finally released after several hours, having been in custody, searched and restrained and finally sent on my way with no explanation as to what they were looking for or what they had done. After my release I attempted to ask the Agents questions but was told to leave or they would arrest me for trespassing and having been detained and harassed for hours, I was in no mood for more.
I arrived over 3 hours late in Palm Springs and missed all my pre-labs and tests; which had to be cancelled and I was told to come back the next week. I spent that night In Palm Springs and headed home the next morning. Upon my arrival back home, I noticed that every one of my prescriptions was missing. I immediately went to the Border Patrol station in Calexico to make a complaint. I was told by the Agent taking the complaint; Captain V. Vega that they were required to do so, that anything the K-9 alerts on must be taken and tested. I asked him if he would send me the results of the tests and he responded, “no records of these stops are made, and that any records that are made, are not public and must be subpoenaed by a judge” I told him that I was arrested and asked him if there were any charges filed against me. After a few minutes I was told that no charges were filed and that because I was not charged there were no records made. He also told me that while they were searching my vehicle that I was not under arrest and was free to go any time I chose to. When he learned that I was cuffed and unable to leave he stated that was the wrong thing for them to do, and that he would look into the circumstances. About a week after making my complaint, I returned to check the status of his investigation and to see if the medications that were taken from me would be returned. I was told that I would have to get a lawyer and subpoena the results of their investigation or to get my medications returned. I have yet to get my medications back, or the test results.
Being somewhat frightened by the events of that Friday, I was hesitant to go back the next week, but was somewhat assured by my complaint that it would not happen again. Fortunately a repeat of that Friday did not happen, in fact for the next 3 months I did not see a K-9 unit at the station and was beginning to forget about the incident of that evening completely; until my appointment with a cancer specialist in Phoenix Arizona in Dec. 2007. On the evening of Dec. 17 2007 I again packed for an emergency meeting with a cancer specialist in Phoenix Arizona. I had begun having unusual cardiac symptoms that were thought to be a result of a cancerous growth in my ascending Aorta. In fact my condition was such that my brother had driven down from Oregon to help me. Unfortunately, when the time came to travel to Phoenix, he had a family emergency and had to fly home, leaving his car for me to take to the doctors’ appointment.
I left late in the evening of December 16th taking Interstate 8 east. I reached the U.S. Border Patrol inspection station at about 2am the morning of the 17th: at that time the inspection station was located at mile 15 on I-8 in Arizona; (it has since been moved to mile 87 on I-8). I noticed that there was a K-9 standing on a platform between the 2 lanes of traffic moving through, sniffing all vehicles. When I reached the front of the line, I heard the K-9 “bark” and the agent told me to pull over to the inspection area. I did as he asked, not wanting a repeat of the California incident. I was told to get out of the car and explained to the Agents what happened to me in California and that I was taking pain medications and that the K-9 was probably alerting to them. I showed them my medical information and doctors notes stating what kinds of medications they were.
After sitting and watching them pull everything out of the car for over an hour, the agents opened my suitcase and took out the medication I was taking. I feel it’s important to mention that I am talking about prescription medications that are legal anywhere in the country; like Hydrocodone, Vicodin and Suboxone; it was these legal prescriptions that were taken and are being taken in these inspections. The Agents explained to me that they were going to take and test the medications and I began to see another scenario where I would have to miss another long distance doctor’s appointment because the Border Patrol took my prescriptions; so I actively resisted. I was then arrested and cuffed and held in a caged unit inside the building for several hours, every one of my requests for medical help being ignored. After about 3 hours a Yuma sheriffs’ officer arrived, officer Martinez, and read me my rights and stated that I was under arrest. This seemed strange to me as after he read me my rights he left and Agent Mendoza, the Border Patrol on duty supervisor, took me to the Yuma jail and booked me in himself.
I did not stop asking for medical help the entire time I was in the custody of the Border Patrol, Yuma Sheriffs or jail guards, (as I suffer from chronic pain and was having serious cardiac problems at the time), but was not allowed to see a doctor, or given any medical aid; despite my injuries and medical history. I do not know if it was because Agent Mendoza booked me, or if it is their policy, but from the time of my being stopped by the Border Patrol until I was finally released 3 days later, I was not allowed to make any phone calls; I was unable to call family to tell them where I was and was not allowed to call and arrange bail. It was only because the doctors called after I missed my appointment that my family and friends came looking for me and found me in the Yuma jail.
I spent the next 3 weeks in Arizona, banned from leaving Arizona by Judge Mark Wayne Reeves and warned of this ruling by the Yuma county public defenders office. In my efforts to get back home and fight these charges I called and asked the courts to have a public defender help me file the necessary papers to allow me to go back home. I was told that it would take several weeks before they could appoint an attorney to me, but that I could; “hire one myself, or act as my own attorney and just plead guilt which would resolve the case and allow me to return home.” After 3 week I was finally appointed James Smith as my public defender who filed the necessary documents and judge Reeves finally made the orders allowing me to go home. I later found out that because I paid full bail I was free to leave and did not need an order allowing me to do so; but the judge still issued a ruling that I not be allowed to leave Arizona until the case was resolved, then reversed the order 3 weeks later with another ruling (documents were also generated, showing just a small part of the harassment I had to undergo over the next 2 years).
Because of the delay in providing me with a public defender, and because of the judges’ orders, I did not learn of the charges against me for over 2 months, when Mr. Smith finally arranged to meet with me. When I read the police and grand jury reports, and what I was being charged with I was shocked. The report stated that Sergeant Mendoza was the K-9 officer (Mendoza was actually the station supervisor that evening and had no part in searching my vehicle or handling the K-9); and that I was being charged with possession of Illegal narcotics, illegal brandishing and possession of a handgun and possession of marijuana. When I read the grand jury report, I was also shocked to learn that the Yuma County Sheriff officer that read me my rights and then left was called to testify as a witness to the grand jury and testified that when I was arrested there was a hand gun “on him”. Officer Martinez was only there for a few minutes, arrived 3 hours after the incident and left immediately, yet he was the only witness allowed to testify to the grand jury. Because of Arizona law, I only had a week to challenge the findings of the grand jury, but because of Arizona and the Yuma County public defenders office policy, I wasn’t appointed an attorney for over 3 weeks and he did not meet with me for another 2 months to discuss the charges.
THE LEGAL CLIMATE
My first meeting with public defender James T. Smith was disappointing at best. I was presented with a plan of appeasing the courts by pleading guilty as soon as possible. I was somewhat angry with his attitude that I must be guilty and because of the “ask for mercy strategy” he had planned; but being a victim and not a criminal I told him what was going on and the truth of that evening. I also explained to him what had happened in California the months earlier, and the truth of what happened in Yuma. I was told to come back in a few weeks and that he would do some research and send me some documents outlining his plan of defense. I received the plan and documents that he had been working on about 2 weeks after our first meeting. In his legal research he quoted legal president from the 1800’s allowing searches without warrant by the border patrol; issues that dealt more with the importing of products from foreign countries than with personal 4th amendment protection or searching vehicles along the Interstate. It was again obvious to me that something was wrong! Why is my attorney not interested in the truth? I told him I had evidence, gave him information as to how and where to gather video evidence of the truth, but was told that the Border Patrol refused to release any video evidence, and my attorney refused to subpoena them. It was now becoming obvious to me that something was very wrong. I demanded another meeting with Mr. Smith and told him to prepare a defense for me; that I wanted to go to trial.
I worked very hard the next few months trying to gather support. I wrote and complained about my situation to Senator Barbara Boxer, Senator John McCain: who was campaigning for president at the time, Governor Janice K. Brewer and Assemblyman V. Manuel Perez. All of whom responded and did varied things. Through my complaints the border patrol inspection station was moved from the western edge of Yuma County over 60 miles away to the Eastern edge of Yuma County @mile 87 to avoid the appearance of interfering with interstate commerce. But the most unfortunate issue I was dealing with was that because I was charged with criminal actions in Arizona, there was nothing they could, or would do to help me with my complaints about the Border Patrol. I though this to be reasonable at the time, until their legal investigators informed me of the truth.
LEGAL INVESTIGATION
I am not a wealthy person and am on a fixed retirement income and am unable to work so I don’t have a lot of money to spend on legal aid and investigation and was very much in need of the help of the public defenders office in Yuma Arizona. I am very grateful for the legal work done for free on my behalf, unfortunately none of it from Yuma or Arizona. Were it not for the gracious help I was given by legal researchers in California I would have been forced into pleading guilty. Arizona immigration laws and their public defenders offices are questionable at best. According to Public defender James T. Smith, public defenders cannot be held responsible for mounting a poor defense, and that all Yuma county public defenders are instructed to advise their clients arrested by the Border Patrol to have them “take a plea,” and that he was told not to mount a defense for me. He later apologized to me that he could not defend me and that he felt his position was so bad, and that because he would no longer do this for Yuma County, he quit his job as a Yuma County Public Defender! I was subsequently appointed another 4 Public defenders over the next year, all of whom refused to mount a defense: another was disbarred.
The most shocking part of what I learned in the research that was done for me is the policies of the U.S. Border Patrol!! It is the policy of the U.S. Border Patrol to NOT prosecute those persons stopped at these stations. To not allow a criminal investigation into the true nature of the way the Border Patrol is operating these stations. There is a huge gray area that exists in 4th amendment rights and the U.S. Border Patrol’s right to violate it. In fact, this is what has occurred. SINCE 2005, NOT ONE PERSONE ARRESTED AT A BORDER PATROL INSPECTION STATIONS HAS BEEN ALLOWED, OR HAVE RECEIVED A TRIAL; every case, including the well known ones (rapper Lil Wayne and Pastor David Anderson; who what seen being tazzed at the same Yuma border patrol station; on CNN. Tazzed while refusing to be searched), have either been dismissed on a technicality, or the person plead guilty. After fighting the charges against me for over 2 years, I was finally scheduled for a trial to start the first of March 2010 and learned from my legal investigators 3 weeks before the trial was to start that I was not going to receive a trial any why, that the Border Patrol will do something to prevent their witnesses from appearing or lose all the evidence, forcing a mistrial. Upon being informed of this practice, and what to expect I again contacted my local representative; Assemblyman V. Manuel Perez and told him that I feared I would also be denied my right to a trial by a jury of my peers. Mr. Perez stated to me that he had a great concern about a politician interfering in criminal matters and how that might look, but agreed to write the judge in my case, Judge Mark Wayne Reeves, and advised him of what we were told. The letter basically stated:” Mr. Berg and his legal team have learned that the U.S. Border patrol may be making efforts to deny a trial and to please see through these efforts and force them to produce witnesses and to mount a fair trial.”
The time for the trial had finally arrived and started on aTuesday, the first part of March, 2010. The first 4 hours were taken by jury selection and Judge Reeves reading the letter from Assembly member Perez. Judge Reeves was extremely upset about the letter and felt that it was inappropriate and stated that if the letter was prompted from any of my actions, or if it happened again that it would be detrimental to my case. After returning from lunch all the prospective jurors were dismissed and Judge Reeves announced that the Border Patrol had re-assigned a witness in my case, Sergeant Mendoza, and that he could not testify: that the Border Patrol reassigned him to special duty in Washington D.C. making him unavailable. Judge Reeves then ruled that the Border Patrol should be allowed 2 weeks to get their witness back in to testify, and rescheduled a new trial and another jury selection to take place in two weeks. I immediately notified Assemblyman V. Manuel Perez and told him what had occurred, he thanked me and stated that if they continue to delay the trial or suppress witnesses or evidence that there was nothing he could do anyway; except be a witness himself to affirm the truth should an investigation ever be mounted.
I was called the weekend before the second trial and jury selection was to begin and told that instead of arriving in court Tuesday morning that the judge wanted to meet that Monday evening, a day early. I arrived in court that Monday evening to learn that the Yuma County Sheriff; officer Martinez (who testified to the grand jury that I had a gun on me), was activated for active duty in the U. S. Military and would be gone indefinitely! He was not asked, but Judge Reeves stated that he could find no conspiracy in these events and that he was forced to delay the trial indefinitely: ruling that the case be “dismissed without prejudice.” This ruling basically means that the case can be opened and I can be tried any time Yuma wants to reopen the case.
LEGAL CLIMATE
With almost 6 years of practice searching vehicles in violation of the 4th amendment, the U.S. Border patrol’s policies and practices have become common knowledge within the legal community. Public defenders in Yuma Arizona know, and are instructed not to defend anyone arrested at the Border Patrol stations. The public defenders talk to their friends about legal matters, and it has become common knowledge within the legal community, that the Border Patrol conducts itself in this manner; withholding witnesses or evidence to prevent a trial. That no one has received a trial. Because of the lack of legal action Agents of the border patrol violate civil rights without consequences and because of the lack of legal intervention after a complaint. Border Patrol Agents now demand these searches and often use force to remove vehicle occupants; despite demands “not to search” by those who know that their rights are being violated. Upon learning that my public defenders were instructed not to help me, I went on a search for legal assistance and ultimately went through 5 public defenders.
I attempted to enlist the assistance of any lawyer allowed to practice in Arizona and was given the same response by every one when I told them that I wanted to go to trial and not allow any efforts to dismiss the case; “you will never get a trial, the judge will dismiss the case eventually.” This common knowledge about what the legal outcome in these cases will be has created a huge windfall for private lawyers and Yuma County. Public defenders know they don’t have to do any work defending these cases and often take on private cases at huge fees. Private attorneys, knowing they only need file some motion or another to get their client off, charge tens of thousands of dollars and boast they can guarantee that if you “go with their help,” they can get the charges dropped. THE UNFORTUNATE TRUTH IN THESE PRACTICES IT THAT REAL CRIMINALS ARRESTED AT THESE INSPECTION STATIONS ARE BEING RELEASED; FOR THE SAME REASON; THE BORDER PATROL VIOLATES THE 4TH AMENDMENT IN THESE SEARCHES AND ANY EVIDENCE GATHERED IS INADMISSABLE ANYWAY!!
WHAT’S HAPPENING NOW
In the last few months since my trial was postponed the situation with the Border Patrol inspections has gotten worse. I still live in Calexico, and continue to have medical problems that require me to travel. I still need to travel to Palm Springs and San Diego at least twice a month. Because I know that my medication will be taken by the Border Patrol, I can no longer go on extended stays because I cannot bring my medications with me. It is an extreme burden to drive the 3 hundred round trip miles but if I don’t drive round trip in one day, I end up going days without any of my prescriptions because the Border Patrol takes them. Unfortunately, I can do nothing about the scents that are left behind. Despite the fact that I have been forced to travel without my meds, I am still stopped and searched by the Border Patrol. The last incident sending me to the hospital: as I was forced to sit outside in the hot desert sun for over an hour. My doctor says that pain meds are often excreted through sweat, and the K-9 could alert on that. I have returned numerous times to make complaints to the Border Patrol station in Calexico and to write and complain to the Department of Justice and my local politicians.
I am now facing the real probability of being forced from my home. Every government agency or officer I contact is unable to help because they feel they cannot involve their office in police or criminal matters and the Agencies that can help have refused to do so; often in violation of laws and civil liberties. So it seems that the bottom line for me is; “polices and practices of the government that I serve, and gave my health for are forcing me out of my home and hastening my deterioration by preventing my access to the doctors and medications I need.” I have found it impossible to continue with the medical treatments I need because of the confiscation of my medications and the dangerous treatment I receive while being searched at these Border Patrol inspection stations; and may be forced to move out of the area that has been the healthiest for me: and out of my home!
I can only attempt to continue to ask for help from agencies like the Americans with Disabilities Act or to write any politician or organization that will help me.
STATEMENT OF COMPLAINT TO THE ADA
THE FOLLOWING IS MY FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST THE U.S. BORDER PATROL, AND THEIR POLICIES AND ACTIONS AT THE INSPECTION STATIONS LOCATED ALONG ROADS AND HIGHWAYS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES, SPECIFICALLY THOSE ALONG I-8 IN CAL. AND AZ., AND ON HWY 86 IN CA. THAT THEY ARE DISCRIMINATORY AGAINST PERSONS WITH DISSABILITIES.
#1: That policies and methods of detection at these stops targets and discriminates against Americans with disabilities who take Narcotic or radiometric meds. That these searches are not random and specifically target and discriminate against Americans with Disabilities and that Border Patrol policies unreasonably target these individuals through their methods of detection and that those stopped undergo searches requiring hours of delays and the confiscation of their legal medications.
#2: That the Border Patrol demands vehicles be emptied of passengers and contents while being searched; and that because these stops are long term and mandatory for everyone, it makes areas like this public access; yet handicapped access is unavailable. Persons left waiting in the inspection area are required to turn off their vehicles and site outside, often in the direct sun. Temperatures within the vehicles during the summer time of year reach limits over 145 degrees and when finally allowed to exit the vehicle these people are not allowed access to wheelchairs or walkers, bathroom facilities or water until after the search is complete and then told to leave the station immediately. Disabled patients requiring wheelchairs and walking devices are denied these, the Border Patrol requiring all items remain in the vehicle; leaving them without the ability to move from the spot they are placed and in danger; should an emergency or the hot sun demand it.
#3: Agents working at these check stations are not trained to deal with medical emergencies. These stations are often remote, located in the desert and people are forced to wait for hours while they are searched, searches being mandatory. Whenever patients with medications that alert the K-9 pass through and be searched have a need for those medications, or an auto accident occurs in traffic, there is no one available or trained in dealing with these situations.
#4: These inspection stations are located along public access roads, and do not cross any borders or pass into private or restrictive areas but their locations are public access and being remote make any preparation for these searches impossible. The Border Patrol is dealing with the public in an area of public access, but does not provide proper accommodation or access to those with disabilities, and many persons are not prepared to have to sit and wait the hours required to finish a search that they don’t bring their medical equipment with them, then realize they don’t have it and cant get it because of the situation.
#5: That the U.S. Border Patrol conducts searches at their inspection stations located on Interstate 8 in California and Arizona, and Hwy. 86 in California, using K-9 dogs to sniff for “Narcotics”, and that because of their policy to confiscate and test these drugs persons with legitimate, legal prescriptions lose them and that this practice targets and discriminates against those persons with disabilities requiring the use of Narcotics or Nuclear reactive cancer medications.
REQUEST
Through this complaint, it is my request that the policy and use of detection equipment that singles out and discriminates against Americans with Disabilities who also take Narcotic or radiometric medications, be removed; specifically the use of K-9 dogs. That these policies single out and harm persons with disabilities because their legal medications are taken and because they must endure harsh treatment while being searched, and that these search stations do not provide the necessary facilities and do not comply with the access requirement stated in the Americans with Disabilities Act.
K-9 units specifically, cannot distinguish differences between what is legal or illegal and so only those persons taking Narcotics or radiometric medications are targeted. And that once stopped have no access to facilities such as bathrooms and drinking fountains, due to the complete absence of them.
I am requesting that the use of K-9 dogs and other methods of detection that do not make a definitive identification be removed and disallowed as an excuse by policy to search vehicles passing through these stations. There are dangers to persons with disabilities sitting in a hot car, and that covered and cooled areas to stop and search vehicles with the appropriate handicapped facilities are completely absent. I would also ask that those persons unable to walk or require assistance are given the help they need by trained personnel and that they are allowed to wait in an inside, cool waiting area with access to proper facilities with ramps and access to drinking water, and that they are allowed access to their medical equipment.
Thank you,
Charles R. Berg
1230 C.N. Perry Calexico, CA. 92231 - Crberg2@juno.com



